On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 07:30:59PM -0400, James Y Knight wrote:
> Could this be the same bug as:
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390722
> and
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/gdb/+bug/111869
> ?
> (with patch available)
No, it's not related.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
Co
Could this be the same bug as:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390722
and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/gdb/+bug/111869
?
(with patch available)
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 06:04:53PM +, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:19:35PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > Is a shared library involved?
> >
> > No, the symbol is local, visibility hidden.
>
> Normally, when this happens, there is a symbol in the ELF symbol
> ta
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:19:35PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Is a shared library involved?
>
> No, the symbol is local, visibility hidden.
Normally, when this happens, there is a symbol in the ELF symbol
table (.symtab) for the hidden symbol. That symbol is missing in your
case.
I don
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 05:00:18PM +, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:47:03PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > (gdb) b smsc_emi_on_query
> > During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from DW_TAG_base_type.
> > During symbol reading, unsupported tag: 'DW_TAG_co
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:47:03PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> (gdb) b smsc_emi_on_query
> During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from DW_TAG_base_type.
> During symbol reading, unsupported tag: 'DW_TAG_const_type'.
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x404520
These complaints are not relevan
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 04:47:02PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Also, the testsuite is still running but I already saw those failures:
>
> Running
> /home/madcoder/debian/tmp/gdb-6.8/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp ...
> FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: breakpoint at start of multi line whil
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:19:35PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> sid:
> (gdb) list smsc_emi_on_query
> No line number known for smsc_emi_on_query.
> (gdb) b smsc_emi_on_query
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x404520
The debug readers were not able to parse this function's debug info.
Is there
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 04:19:35PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 04:13:39PM +, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > #0 sms_emi_ack_5X (out=0x1b1dc88, msg=0x7fff637d97e0) at
> > > lib-inet/sms-emi.c:230
>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 04:13:39PM +, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > #0 sms_emi_ack_5X (out=0x1b1dc88, msg=0x7fff637d97e0) at
> > lib-inet/sms-emi.c:230
> > #1 0x00404973 in ?? ()
>
> > With gdb from etch:
> > (gdb) bt
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> #0 sms_emi_ack_5X (out=0x1b1dc88, msg=0x7fff637d97e0) at
> lib-inet/sms-emi.c:230
> #1 0x00404973 in ?? ()
> With gdb from etch:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 sms_emi_ack_5X (out=0x110dc88, msg=0x7fff73230240) at
> lib-inet/sms-emi.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 03:58:18PM +, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> severity 485955 normal
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 05:41:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Since the 6.8 releases, gdb totally fails to detect stack frames
> > correctly, whereas the lenny version (6.7.1-2 atm) wor
severity 485955 normal
thanks
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 05:41:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Since the 6.8 releases, gdb totally fails to detect stack frames
> correctly, whereas the lenny version (6.7.1-2 atm) works fine. My
> architecture is amd64, but I've seen the same issues on i386 FWI
Package: gdb
Version: 6.8-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since the 6.8 releases, gdb totally fails to detect stack frames
correctly, whereas the lenny version (6.7.1-2 atm) works fine. My
architecture is amd64, but I've seen the same issues on i386 FWIW.
The code is
14 matches
Mail list logo
