On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:42:18AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> So, if you can convince me that this package's existence improves Debian,
> I'll sponsor an NMU; but I think a better reaction to this RC bug would be
> to treat it as a suitable excuse to remove bclock from the archive.
Removal req
Hi,
Thank you for your attention to making Debian less buggy. I've looked at the
interdiff for your 1.0-12.1 NMU and it looks good to me (except that you
could have closed the other bugs you fixed - menu structure and x-dev
dependency - in the changelog: there are Debian bugs open for both).
Howev
Hi there,
I updated the nmu and made both changes described in previous emails.
Also, I uploaded this to mentors in case somebody wants to upload it.
Saludos,
Mauro
--
JID: lavaram...@jabber.org | http://lusers.com.ar/
2B82 A38D 1BA5 847A A74D 6C34 6AB7 9ED6 C8FD F9C1
diff -u bclock-1.0/debian/m
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > Here's a debdiff attached of a NMU to close this bug.
>
> Please use 1.0-12.1 as version, see Developers' reference, 5.11.2.
>
Right, my bad, sorry.
> > BTW, I was about to remove the obsolote build-dep on
> > x-dev, but this should be done when o
> Here's a debdiff attached of a NMU to close this bug.
Please use 1.0-12.1 as version, see Developers' reference, 5.11.2.
> BTW, I was about to remove the obsolote build-dep on
> x-dev, but this should be done when orphaned, may be
> it's time to do it?
It could save time from doing another NMU
tags 485197 + patch
thanks
Hello,
Here's a debdiff attached of a NMU to close this bug.
BTW, I was about to remove the obsolote build-dep on
x-dev, but this should be done when orphaned, may be
it's time to do it?
Regards,
Mauro
--
JID: lavaram...@jabber.org | http://lusers.com.ar/
2B82 A38D 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
