On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 18:34 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Walter Franzini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > I think it would be better to not run the testsuite.
> >
> > I'm not sure it will be the right choice.
>
>
> Well, I understand the concern, but unless someone comes up with a
> pa
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> So, at least as a temporary solution, building without the testsuite
> seems to be the best way to get the package in Debian lenny...
As a *temporary* solution it's ok for me.
In the meantime I will look at a change-set in the development br
Quoting Walter Franzini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I think it would be better to not run the testsuite.
>
> I'm not sure it will be the right choice.
Well, I understand the concern, but unless someone comes up with a
patch that fixes the testsuite to properly run on autobuilders, it
fails and mak
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Well, what I wonder is the point of running the testsuite when
> building the package. I understand that, as upstream author, you
> introduce a testsuitethis is even a very good practice.
>
> However, I don't really see any point in runnin
Quoting Walter Franzini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > The package properly builds on my system. However, it fails to build
> > in pbuilder (and will therefore fail to build on autobuilders).
>
> Then it's a different (and known) problem.
>
> I'm not sure what autobuilders are, however on
> http://bui
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Walter Franzini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > As far as I have tested the proposed patch does not fix the build
>> > problem...
>>
>> Strange, the test script in the patch was used to verify the
Quoting Walter Franzini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As far as I have tested the proposed patch does not fix the build
> > problem...
>
> Strange, the test script in the patch was used to verify the
> correcteness of the fix.
>
> I will look at it ag
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As far as I have tested the proposed patch does not fix the build
> problem...
Strange, the test script in the patch was used to verify the
correcteness of the fix.
I will look at it again.
Can you send me a sample of the errors? thanks.
--
Walte
As far as I have tested the proposed patch does not fix the build
problem...
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
9 matches
Mail list logo