benedikt.ahr...@unice.fr wrote:
> We are discussing a bit on the gnewsense-users mailing list, see [1]
> for the history so far. If you can afford some time, please come and
> join us there.
> ben
> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-users/2009-09/msg00098.html
Sorry, I don't have ti
We are discussing a bit on the gnewsense-users mailing list, see [1] for
the history so far. If you can afford some time, please come and join us
there.
ben
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-users/2009-09/msg00098.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.deb
Hi,
thanks for keeping us informed.
benedikt.ahr...@unice.fr wrote:
> I'll forward all the comments collected to the AMS team.
Thanks for that.
> Here's a copy of the draft license that I propose to append to the
> current AMS-LaTeX distributions. Do you have any questions or
> comments befo
Hello,
attached you'll find the license suggested by the AMSTech team for the
current amslatex release.
Please feel free to comment and thus help to get this bug done. In
particular please answer to David's question of how to get licensing
done properly (I think the 00LLICENSE file in the ro
4 matches
Mail list logo
