Hi Sven,
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:08:02AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> This is a change for the worse, IMHO. Judging by the posts I've read in
I disagree.
> the past on debian-user, at least 95% of the users did _not_ install
> recommended packages by default, because that would pull in a lot
On 2008-04-06 17:37 +0200, James Vega wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 04:32:40PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>> I *did* read the warning about not reporting bug for dependencies in
>> devscripts but I really fail to see why there should be an exception in that
>> package. If I do the same in
Quoting James Vega ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> We're currently changing the packaging to use Recommends instead of
> Suggests. We're not elevating everything to Depends since the required
> functionality of the package varies on which scripts are actually of
> interest to the user. Since Recommends a
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 04:32:40PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I *did* read the warning about not reporting bug for dependencies in
> devscripts but I really fail to see why there should be an exception in that
> package. If I do the same in one of my packages, I'll get an RC bug as
> reward
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.21
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
debchange uses the Parse:DebControl module and devscripts only Suggests
libparse-debcontrol-perl.
I *did* read the warning about not reporting bug for dependencies in
devscripts but I really fail to see why there sho
5 matches
Mail list logo
