Daniel Glassey wrote:
> Yes, I made a mess of that not updating the bug. I've checked with
> upstream and they have some ideas to try (incidentally it is a firefox
> bug that leads down the bad code path, but still a bug that needs
> fixed in graphite/pango-graphite). If I can get a fixed package
>
2008/10/2 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Thomas Viehmann [Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:59:38 +0200]:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> pango-graphite "owns" a critical bug, #471642 and dupes, since April
>> with no visible maintainer activity.
>> As it's not been released with stable before and has no reverse
>> depend
* Thomas Viehmann [Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:59:38 +0200]:
> Hi,
> pango-graphite "owns" a critical bug, #471642 and dupes, since April
> with no visible maintainer activity.
> As it's not been released with stable before and has no reverse
> dependencies, it appears to be an ideal removal candidate.
Hi,
pango-graphite "owns" a critical bug, #471642 and dupes, since April
with no visible maintainer activity.
As it's not been released with stable before and has no reverse
dependencies, it appears to be an ideal removal candidate.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
4 matches
Mail list logo