Bug#462678: gs x11 device is in ghostscript-x

clone 462678 -1 reassign -1 kghostview retitle -1 Dependency should be updated from gs to ghostscript-x severity -1 important thanks On Sunday 27 January 2008, brian m. carlson wrote: > Ghostscript's x11 devices are in ghostscript-x. gs-gpl and gs-esp both > depend on both ghostscript and ghostsc

Processed: Re: Bug#462678: gs x11 device is in ghostscript-x

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 462678 -1 Bug#462678: ghostscript: gs no longer supports the x11 output device Bug 462678 cloned as bug 462785. > reassign -1 kghostview Bug#462785: ghostscript: gs no longer supports the x11 output device Bug reassigned from package `ghostscript

Bug#462678: gs x11 device is in ghostscript-x

Ghostscript's x11 devices are in ghostscript-x. gs-gpl and gs-esp both depend on both ghostscript and ghostscript-x, so there's no backward compatibility issue. It looks like kghostview depends on gs, which is a very old package name (it's what gs-gpl used to be called, and what gs-gpl provid