Bug#462268: [Popcon-developers] Bug#462268: i dont understand this...

2008-04-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Bill Allombert] > The number of stable subscription has been raising again before we > change unstable. This is true, and I can not explain it. > The number of machine running unstable is so small that it cannot do > a difference. I believe this is false. As almost all machines in a given time

Bug#462268: [Popcon-developers] Bug#462268: i dont understand this...

2008-03-20 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Thursday 20 March 2008 00:11, you wrote: > Must admit I am surprised to see some decrease already, with 77 > machines upgraded to version 1.44 in unstable, and down 21 > submissions. I must say I'm not surprised. We basically *know* (*) this is because the clients are DOSing the server at

Bug#462268: [Popcon-developers] Bug#462268: i dont understand this...

2008-03-19 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Petter Reinholdtsen] > A decrease is a lot harder to explain as anything else than a DOS > issue, so I decided to test if that will happen first. This is the way I plan to extract the measurements: ssh popcon.debian.org (cd /org/popcon.debian.org/popcon-mail/all-popcon-results; \ for f in

Bug#462268: [Popcon-developers] Bug#462268: i dont understand this...

2008-03-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Wednesday 19 March 2008 12:03, you wrote: > Note that I decided to test the hypothesis of random sleep not > affecting number of submissions by disabling the workaround and see if > the amount of submissions go down, wouldn't it have been better to let this version go to testing and see,

Bug#462268: [Popcon-developers] Bug#462268: i dont understand this...

2008-03-19 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Holger Levsen] > Can you please close this bug, so that the release team has one bug less to > worry about? Note that I decided to test the hypothesis of random sleep not affecting number of submissions by disabling the workaround and see if the amount of submissions go down, so version 1.44 is