[Bill Allombert]
> The number of stable subscription has been raising again before we
> change unstable.
This is true, and I can not explain it.
> The number of machine running unstable is so small that it cannot do
> a difference.
I believe this is false. As almost all machines in a given time
Hi,
On Thursday 20 March 2008 00:11, you wrote:
> Must admit I am surprised to see some decrease already, with 77
> machines upgraded to version 1.44 in unstable, and down 21
> submissions.
I must say I'm not surprised. We basically *know* (*) this is because the
clients are DOSing the server at
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> A decrease is a lot harder to explain as anything else than a DOS
> issue, so I decided to test if that will happen first.
This is the way I plan to extract the measurements:
ssh popcon.debian.org
(cd /org/popcon.debian.org/popcon-mail/all-popcon-results; \
for f in
Hi,
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 12:03, you wrote:
> Note that I decided to test the hypothesis of random sleep not
> affecting number of submissions by disabling the workaround and see if
> the amount of submissions go down,
wouldn't it have been better to let this version go to testing and see,
[Holger Levsen]
> Can you please close this bug, so that the release team has one bug less to
> worry about?
Note that I decided to test the hypothesis of random sleep not
affecting number of submissions by disabling the workaround and see if
the amount of submissions go down, so version 1.44 is
5 matches
Mail list logo