Bug#446665: gcc-4.1 essential on armel

2008/3/13, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Martin Guy wrote: > > Hi! > > FWIW, the new arm port "armel" requires gcc-4.1.1, since its new ABI > > support only made it, so we'd vote for rotd and gcc-4.1, and the gcc-4 > > patch for #297217 "invalid lvalue in assignment" is sufficient to make

Bug#446665: gcc-4.1 essential on armel

Martin Guy wrote: > Hi! > FWIW, the new arm port "armel" requires gcc-4.1.1, since its new ABI > support only made it, so we'd vote for rotd and gcc-4.1, and the gcc-4 > patch for #297217 "invalid lvalue in assignment" is sufficient to make > the current ancient version compile for us. gcc-4.3 i

Bug#446665: gcc-4.1 essential on armel

Hi! FWIW, the new arm port "armel" requires gcc-4.1.1, since its new ABI support only made it, so we'd vote for rotd and gcc-4.1, and the gcc-4 patch for #297217 "invalid lvalue in assignment" is sufficient to make the current ancient version compile for us. M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to