Bug#446332: Update on this bug

2009-12-13 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Luk Claes wrote: I think it's wrong to leave non-regressions unfixed. Though this bug might qualify for a downgrade of the severity to important. I leave it up to you to dowgrade the severity if you thinks that's justified. I agree with you, Luk. I'll be working on fixin

Bug#446332: Update on this bug

2009-12-13 Thread Luk Claes
Asheesh Laroia wrote: > Hey Luk, Tim, and others, > > This is bug in the c-client IMAP core that sits inside UW IMAP. The bug > here seems to be, "When alpine notifies you that it has gone read-only, > it still allows you to make changes it will throw away." The appropriate > simple resolution see

Bug#446332: Update on this bug

2009-12-11 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hey Luk, Tim, and others, This is bug in the c-client IMAP core that sits inside UW IMAP. The bug here seems to be, "When alpine notifies you that it has gone read-only, it still allows you to make changes it will throw away." The appropriate simple resolution seems to be, "Modify the alpine U