Bug#445797: fixed in libcaca 0.99.beta12.debian-3

2007-10-21 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Sam, On Mi, 17 Okt 2007, Sam Hocevar wrote: >Okay, you make perfect sense. Can you suggest a strategy that lets > me know the required font? Of course I can test packages one after the > other but I'd like to understand what's going on if possible. One way I did suggest somewhere else is t

Bug#445797: fixed in libcaca 0.99.beta12.debian-3

2007-10-16 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007, Frank Küster wrote: > Please don't do it that way. Both because it's a bad idea and because > we intend to file bugs about this soon (read: as soon as one among the > TeX team has some free time, which might well be next year). > > It's a bad idea because the texlive metapa

Bug#445797: fixed in libcaca 0.99.beta12.debian-3

2007-10-16 Thread Frank Küster
Hi Sam, Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > libcaca (0.99.beta12.debian-3) unstable; urgency=low > . >* debian/control: > + Build-depend on texlive instead of all the other texlive-* packages so >that we have the proper fonts at build time (Closes: #44579