Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Note that with my old, apt-setup would only default to using a mirror
> > and thus time out. Your patch was intended to avoid that time out
> > (which is fine), but at the cost of breaking the normal case. IMO
> > timing out in situations that occur only rare
Frans Pop wrote:
> Note that with my old, apt-setup would only default to using a mirror and
> thus time out. Your patch was intended to avoid that time out (which is
> fine), but at the cost of breaking the normal case. IMO timing out in
> situations that occur only rarely is even somewhat acce
On Monday 24 September 2007, you wrote:
> Is there a reason why you chose to make apt-setup look at netcfg's
> question instead of just checking for a default route?
No, there is not. I basically did not have the "no NIC present" use case in
mind.
> If asking the question interactively does not
Frans Pop wrote:
> Getting the question asked interactively does _not_ set the seen flag, which
> means that currently with a netinst install at default priority you do not
> get a mirror.
Is there a reason why you chose to make apt-setup look at netcfg's
question instead of just checking for a
Package: apt-setup
Severity: serious
Version: 1:0.27
The check added by Joey to see if the DHCP question was asked is broken.
Getting the question asked interactively does _not_ set the seen flag, which
means that currently with a netinst install at default priority you do not
get a mirror.
s
5 matches
Mail list logo
