On Fre, 14 Sep 2007, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > > I got a response from the luatex people: the case is known, fixed
> > > in the repository and a new shapshot is out probably next week.
> > > Tagging pending.
> >
> > Will you also prepare the package for upload?
> >
> In the moment I don't have t
On 13.09.07 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > I got a response from the luatex people: the case is known, fixed
> > in the repository and a new shapshot is out probably next week.
> > Tagging pending.
>
> Will you also prepare the package
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 441836 + pending
> stop
>
> On 11.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Preloading the plain format: codes, registers,luatex:
>> ../../../../src/texk/web2c/luatexdir/lua/luanode.c:453: get_node:
>> Assertion `varmem_sizes[r]<0'
On Mit, 12 Sep 2007, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > Version: 0.11.0-1
> >
> According to http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex the latest
> version of luatex is 0.10.2. Where did you get the 0.11.0 from? Is
It is snapshot-something, but declares itself as 0.10.2 ... I guess it
was failure of Taco
tags 441836 + pending
stop
On 11.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Preloading the plain format: codes, registers,luatex:
> ../../../../src/texk/web2c/luatexdir/lua/luanode.c:453: get_node:
> Assertion `varmem_sizes[r]<0' failed.
>
I got a response from the luatex people: the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 441836 + pending
Bug#441836: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> Thanks for answering. The question was not for you but for Norbert,
> who built the luatex package. It seems, he packaged a non-existing
> version of luatex. ;-)
If the nonexistent version worked, that would be quite useful skill ;^)
Cheers,
--
Raf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 12.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > According to http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex the latest
> > version of luatex is 0.10.2. Where did you get the 0.11.0 from?
> > Is that a versioned snap shot?
>
> Debian repository.
>
Thanks for answe
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> According to http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex the latest
> version of luatex is 0.10.2. Where did you get the 0.11.0 from? Is
> that a versioned snap shot?
Debian repository.
Cheers,
--
Raf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
On 11.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Norbert,
> Package: luatex
> Version: 0.11.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
According to http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex the latest
version of luatex is 0.10.2. Where did you get the 0.11.0 from? Is
that a versioned snap shot?
H,
--
sigm
On 11.09.07 Rafal Czlonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> When I try to install luatex all I get is:
>
> fmtutil: running `luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex tex.ini' ...
> This is luaTeX, Version 3.141592-beta-0.11.0-2007090818 (Web2C 7.5.6) (INITEX)
> (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex
Package: luatex
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
When I try to install luatex all I get is:
fmtutil: running `luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex tex.ini' ...
This is luaTeX, Version 3.141592-beta-0.11.0-2007090818 (Web2C 7.5.6) (INITEX)
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/plain/config/
12 matches
Mail list logo