Bug#436249: package status

2007-10-15 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-14 11:34]: > Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > > On Saturday 13 October 2007 11:09:45 Nico Golde wrote: [...] > The packaging for this will be done tomorrow. One of the open bugs required a > code change which wasn't released until last weekend when I

Bug#436249: package status

2007-10-13 Thread ehearn
Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > On Saturday 13 October 2007 11:09:45 Nico Golde wrote: >> Hi, >> I really don't want to piss you off but see this fixed. >> What is the current status. >> It should not need 3 weeks to prepare a new upload should >> it? If some sponsoring is needed feel free to ping me.

Bug#436249: package status

2007-10-13 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Saturday 13 October 2007 11:09:45 Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > I really don't want to piss you off but see this fixed. > What is the current status. > It should not need 3 weeks to prepare a new upload should > it? If some sponsoring is needed feel free to ping me. I pinged Ervin a few times, but

Bug#436249: package status

2007-10-13 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, I really don't want to piss you off but see this fixed. What is the current status. It should not need 3 weeks to prepare a new upload should it? If some sponsoring is needed feel free to ping me. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For se

Bug#436249: package status

2007-10-06 Thread Steffen Joeris
Hi Just wondering about the packaging progress of the new upstream version. Looking over the pennmush upstream changelog, it seems that a few buffer overflows were fixed as well. It would be really nice to get the newest upstream version into unstable (and then testing). Cheers Steffen signa