also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.11.1829 +0200]:
> > Can someone please explain what changed (package/version) that this is
> > causing problems?
> mount dropped its own code to parse LABEL= and UUID= and now uses the
> persistent names created by udev.
> The lvm and mdadm pack
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 14, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.09.10.1409 +0200]:
> > > I will do it ASAP. Please do not do this by yourself because the udev
> > > rules files need to be renamed first (or else I would need to add
> >
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.09.10.1409 +0200]:
> I will do it ASAP. Please do not do this by yourself because the udev
> rules files need to be renamed first (or else I would need to add
> conflicts and you would need to move the file).
Can you please give me an ETA? Tomorro
On Sep 06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am going to prepare a new mdadm package soon and it would be nice
> if you could send me the udev rules file for that (and maybe some
> instructions as to what else I have to do).
I will do it ASAP. Please do not do this by yourself because
tags 435983 help moreinfo
retitle 435983 please add udev rules to make mdadm register /dev/disk symlinks
thanks
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.11.1829 +0200]:
> mount dropped its own code to parse LABEL= and UUID= and now uses the
> persistent names created by udev.
> The lv
- Forwarded message from James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#435983: mount: fails to detect LABEL=foo filesystems
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-
On 8/9/07, Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:48:45AM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> > On 8/7/07, Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please tell udev version installed.
>
> And please show mdadm version and configuration.
# dpkg -l udev mdadm
Desired
On Aug 11, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone please explain what changed (package/version) that this is
> causing problems?
mount dropped its own code to parse LABEL= and UUID= and now uses the
persistent names created by udev.
The lvm and mdadm packages need to ship a rules fil
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 11:06:34AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 09, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OK. But FWIW I would have appreciated some advance warning that the
> > configuration I was using [*] was deprecated and support would be
> > withdrawn soon, before the supp
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:48:45AM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> On 8/7/07, Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please tell udev version installed.
And please show mdadm version and configuration.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Aug 09, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. But FWIW I would have appreciated some advance warning that the
> configuration I was using [*] was deprecated and support would be
> withdrawn soon, before the support was actually withdrawn.
It's not deprecated, LVM and mdadm needs to
On 8/9/07, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really. But if your problems are caused by LVM devices then you should
> talk with the LVM maintainers too.
OK. But FWIW I would have appreciated some advance warning that the
configuration I was using [*] was deprecated and support would be
On Aug 09, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2 & MD),
> > This is the real problem.
> > The mdadm maintainer needs to integrate in his package support for
> > persistent device names (i.e. install the appropriate rules fil
On 8/8/07, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 04, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > LABEL=foo entries can no longer be mounted;
> I love generalizations...
>
> > So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2 & MD),
> This is the real problem.
> The mdad
On 8/7/07, Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please tell udev version installed.
~$ dpkg -l udev
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=ba
reassign 435983 mdadm
--
done
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:44:32PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 04, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > LABEL=foo entries can no longer be mounted;
> I love generalizations...
>
> > So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 435983 mdadm
Bug#435983: mount: fails to detect LABEL=foo filesystems
Bug reassigned from package `mount' to `mdadm'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
On Aug 04, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LABEL=foo entries can no longer be mounted;
I love generalizations...
> So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2 & MD),
This is the real problem.
The mdadm maintainer needs to integrate in his package support for
persis
Please tell udev version installed.
You are using 2.6.18-4-xen-686 kernel from etch? Is xen in use?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/5/07, LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:43:04PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> > Everything worked fine 'til I upgraded...
> > So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2 & MD),
> > and since mount no longer itself supports LABEL= directly
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:43:04PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> Everything worked fine 'til I upgraded...
> So, whatever populates /dev/disk/by-label is not aware of (LVM2 & MD),
> and since mount no longer itself supports LABEL= directly, mount fails
> to mopunt perfectly good filesystems. Thi
Package: mount
Version: 2.13~rc2-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Everything worked fine 'til I upgraded...
LABEL=foo entries can no longer be mounted; this causes the system to
be wholly unusable if (say) /usr is mounted via a labelled filesystem.
I've been using LABE
22 matches
Mail list logo
