Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: >> OK, I've found it. The ClassNotFoundException is thrown from a security >> check >> in libgcj. We are calling Method m1 from method m0, and m1's class loader >> is different from m0's class loader. We have to check that for every arg >> in m1, the ac

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-04 Thread Tom Tromey
Andrew> To be clear: the two class loaders being checked are those of Andrew> interface org.eclipse.core.runtime.IPluginDescriptor Andrew> and Andrew> class org.eclipse.core.runtime.Platform Andrew> Tromey: are you quite sure we should be checking the class loader Andrew> of the interface type

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Appli

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: There are areas where compliant jvms might behave differently. For example, the exact time when dependent classes are loaded isn't defined. Maybe at class initialization time, maybe later. All the the spec requires is that ClassNotFoundExceptions aren't raised until classes

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> And what was the reason? I need to know. >> >> !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 >> !MESSAGE Application error >> !STACK 1 >> j

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin at org.eclip

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.inte

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:38PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: Hello, A while ago, I wrote: Using the following pakages: * java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2 * ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1 * libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3 * gcc-

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-01 Thread Michael Koch
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:38PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: > Hello, > > A while ago, I wrote: > > > Using the following pakages: > > > * java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2 > > > * ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1 > > > * libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3 >

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-17 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:33:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls Runtime.exit()? I tried to debug this but I dont found ou

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-16 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:33:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls > >> Runtime.exit()? > > > > I tried to debug this but I dont found out

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls Runtime.exit()? I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where exit is called with code 13. What went wrong with the debugging? Do

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-16 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls > Runtime.exit()? I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where exit is called with code 13. > I'm betting it's a bogus version check. What kind of vers

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Haley
Thomas Girard wrote: Hello, A while ago, I wrote: Using the following pakages: * java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2 * ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1 * libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3 * gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-3 * gcj-4.1-base, gcj-4.1, gij-4.1, libgcj7-1 4

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-15 Thread Thomas Girard
Hello, A while ago, I wrote: > > Using the following pakages: > > * java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2 > > * ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1 > > * libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3 > > * gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-3 > > * gcj-4.1-base, gcj-4.1, gij-4.1, libgcj7-1 4

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-01-26 Thread Thomas Girard
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 17:12 +0100, Michael Koch a écrit : > I have just tried this with SUN JDK 6, Icedtea, gcj 4.3, jamvm and cacao > with the following result: > > SUN JDK 6: Just works. > > gcj-4.3: No output at all. Returns with exit code 13. > > icedtea: No output at all. Returns with

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-01-26 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote: > reassign 432541 gcj-4.2 > retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins > merge 432539 432541 > thanks > > Hi, > > after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using > snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2007-10-27 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 432541 eclipse-cdt clone 432541 -1 reassign -1 gcj-4.3 thanks eclipse-cdt still FTBFS, so keeping a duplicate there. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2007-10-27 Thread Thomas Girard
reassign 432541 gcj-4.2 retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins merge 432539 432541 thanks Hi, after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that the FTBFS occurs with gcj-4.2, and is not related to ecj. Indeed, using the fol