Steve Kemp wrote:
> yes that is correct.
thanks.
> If you're happy to upload soon that would be great. I'll attach the
> patch I used.
uploaded 0.1.6-2 with your patch and urgency=high, so you probably want
to mention this version for testing/sid in the DSA.
no offence intended, but i'd b
On Sun Jul 01, 2007 at 21:47:42 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> uploaded 0.1.6-2 with your patch and urgency=high, so you probably want
> to mention this version for testing/sid in the DSA.
Great.
> no offence intended, but i'd be happy if you can next time attach the
> patch to the bug report
On Sun Jul 01, 2007 at 20:54:24 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> I assume that the 0.1.4-2etch1 upload a few minutes ago was a security
> upload of yours, hence I'll wait until this appears and upload then a
> fixed package to sid.
yes that is correct.
If you're happy to upload soon that would
Steve Kemp wrote:
> Security issue: CVE-2007-2838
>
> The gsambad package contains a binary (which may only be
> executed by the root user) with the following code in it:
I assume that the 0.1.4-2etch1 upload a few minutes ago was a security
upload of yours, hence I'll wait until
Package: gsambad
Version: 0.1.5-5
Severity: grave
Usertags: sourcescan
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Security issue: CVE-2007-2838
The gsambad package contains a binary (which may only be
executed by the root user) with the following code in it:
if((fp=po
5 matches
Mail list logo
