Bug#415954: Bug#416156: PID handling in init.d is fragile

2007-03-28 Thread José Luis Tallón
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > [snip] >>> Fine. I did put the function back where it was though, instead of moving >>> it way below, because the stuff in between can hang (for example, when >>> failing to connect, it'll indefinitely retry every 15 seconds, causing >>> 'start' to hang). >>> >>>

Bug#415954: Bug#416156: PID handling in init.d is fragile

2007-03-28 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:01:09PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > It's a misconfiguration, sure, but one that happens on default install > > (out of the box imapproxy is misconfigured? Well, it was in my case, but > > probably related to the fact that I don't actu

Bug#415954: Bug#416156: PID handling in init.d is fragile

2007-03-28 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:26:27AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Uploaded as NMU, because I actually made some changes. > > > Reviewed them. Gotta ACK, anyway. > (You are right in the changes you made, I would have done it differently) That's of course fine,

Bug#415954: Bug#416156: PID handling in init.d is fragile

2007-03-28 Thread José Luis Tallón
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Can you please bounce this mail to the bug log? I didn't want to do so > because this is private mail, but this really really should be part of > the bug log. > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:13:39AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: > >> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: >>