Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-16 Thread Michael Koch
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:47:14AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote: > Hello Michael, > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:35:59AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > > > > Well I consider "jamvm -cp Test.jar Test" and "jamvm -jar Test.jar" not > > working a major issue. If I wouldn't, we wouldn't need a fix for

Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-15 Thread Nicolas François
Hello Michael, On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:35:59AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > > Well I consider "jamvm -cp Test.jar Test" and "jamvm -jar Test.jar" not > working a major issue. If I wouldn't, we wouldn't need a fix for this. > These two are the main usecases for every Java runtime and should jus

Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-14 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:01:00AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote: > Hello Michael, > > > Thanks for your investigation. I tested the patch and it doesn't fixed > > the isseue. I'm working on another solution for this and will then > > upload it to t-p-u. > > Can you describe the problem? > > I c

Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-14 Thread Nicolas François
Hello Michael, > Thanks for your investigation. I tested the patch and it doesn't fixed > the isseue. I'm working on another solution for this and will then > upload it to t-p-u. Can you describe the problem? I could successfully use: java -Djava.util.logging.config.file=my.properties -cp Te

Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-12 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:05:23AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote: > reassign 413116 classpath 0.91-3 > # I tested it with 0.92-4, but 0.92-1 was probably fixed too. > notfound 413116 0.92-4 > tags 413116 patch > thanks > > Hello, > > Thanks Michel and Matthew for your answers. > > I'm reassignin

Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-11 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Nicolas Fran�ois wrote: Otherwise, I either can't reproduce this bug or don't understand the problem described in this bug: Is it that jamvm doesn't work, or just that the java.util.logging package cannot be configured? Jamvm does not work on the trivial Java program _when

Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-11 Thread mcdmx
Nicolas François wrote: Michel, Matthew, Bob, can you confirm that this bug still exists? Can you try the above example? And if it works, can you also provide an application which fails? Your example works fine when loading the class directly from the filesystem: $ jamvm -Djava.util.logging.co

Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-11 Thread Nicolas François
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:02:50PM -0600, Bob Black wrote: > Does anyone have a logging.properties file that works with jamvm > (+ classpath)? jamvm uses classpath's java.util.logging. I don't think it would require any special content. Here is an example: == logging.properties

Bug#413116: jamvm issues with java.util.logging

2007-03-08 Thread Bob Black
Does anyone have a logging.properties file that works with jamvm (+ classpath)? I've tried various contents and nothing seems to work, if I run "strace -f -e trace=open jamvm -verbose" I can see that it seems to die in the same spot no matter the contents. open("/usr/lib/logging.properties", O