On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:04:47PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi Sam and Larry,
> Sam Hocevar wrote:
> >> I don't know what went wrong the first time, I tried
> >> again and Electric Fence found it. Please test.
> >> "It works for me" on both broken2.jp2 and broken4.jp2.
> >Your patch wor
Hi Sam and Larry,
Sam Hocevar wrote:
>> I don't know what went wrong the first time, I tried
>> again and Electric Fence found it. Please test.
>> "It works for me" on both broken2.jp2 and broken4.jp2.
>
>Your patch works, with all broken*.jp2 files. Here is a slightly
> better one that chec
tag 413041 +patch
thanks
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know what went wrong the first time, I tried
> again and Electric Fence found it. Please test.
> "It works for me" on both broken2.jp2 and broken4.jp2.
Your patch works, with all broken*.jp2 files. Here is a sl
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:08:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's quite a Heisenbug, disappearing when you put any
> malloc in besides vanilla libc; I tried electric fence
> and dmalloc, I understand valgrind is the same.
I don't know what went wrong the first time, I tried
again and Elect
I have to walk away from this bug for a while. Maybe this
message can give someone else a head start.
It's quite a Heisenbug, disappearing when you put any
malloc in besides vanilla libc; I tried electric fence
and dmalloc, I understand valgrind is the same.
My comments refer to broken2.jp2. Th
5 matches
Mail list logo
