On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:27:46 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I think the attached patch would work. I'll NMU in a few days if there
> are no objections (earlier if I get an ACK).
>
Uploaded to DELAYED/3-day.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[dropped -release]
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 22:16:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > I don't understand this: IIUC the package never worked for these archs.
> > > So wouldn't it be OK to upload a 1.16 with big-endian
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 12:26:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Steve Langasek, le Sun 04 Feb 2007 15:05:37 -0800, a écrit :
> > > I am raising the severity of 408741 to 'grave', which is the correct
> > > severity for such
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Steve Langasek, le Sun 04 Feb 2007 15:05:37 -0800, a écrit :
> > I am raising the severity of 408741 to 'grave', which is the correct
> > severity for such a bug.
> I don't understand this: IIUC the package never worked for these a
Steve Langasek, le Sun 04 Feb 2007 15:05:37 -0800, a écrit :
> I am raising the severity of 408741 to 'grave', which is the correct
> severity for such a bug.
I don't understand this: IIUC the package never worked for these archs.
So wouldn't it be OK to upload a 1.16 with big-endian archs disable
5 matches
Mail list logo
