Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404739 important
Bug#404739: gss: FTBFS on amd64: segmentation fault.
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
severity 404739 important
thanks
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:07:45AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Sorry, what's the rationale of this bug being marked as 'grave'?
> If I understand Russ correctly, I believe it would be that this
> problem makes the package unusable for amd64 users. That seem
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:23:47AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > We should raise the severity of the bug to grave (better than serious,
> > since it's a usability issue, not a policy violation) and upload a new
> > 0.0.18 version with the minimal patch. I think the release team will be
> > hap
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Uploading 0.0.19 to Debian at this time is surely a bad idea. Should we
>> raise the severity of this bug to serious, since it is FTBFS, and do
>> another upload of 0.0.18 plus the minimal patch that solve
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404739 grave
Bug#404739: gss: FTBFS on amd64: segmentation fault.
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> tags 404739 patch upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#404739: gss: FTBFS on amd64: segmentation fault.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pat
5 matches
Mail list logo
