Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 à 13:02 -0800, Keith Packard a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:46 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > The fix is to have these packages register their fonts to defoma. This
> > > will automatically run fc-cache -f in the def
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:46 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > The fix is to have these packages register their fonts to defoma. This
> > will automatically run fc-cache -f in the defoma directory.
>
> Either defoma is borken, or dh_installdefoma doesn't
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 20:53 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
> > I think I could fix upstream fontconfig to do a more careful check when
> > fc-cache is run and finds font files newer than the cache for their
> > directory. I don't do that at library initializa
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The fix is to have these packages register their fonts to defoma. This
> will automatically run fc-cache -f in the defoma directory.
Either defoma is borken, or dh_installdefoma doesn't generate the
appropriate snippet for what you describe. ttf-d
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
> I think I could fix upstream fontconfig to do a more careful check when
> fc-cache is run and finds font files newer than the cache for their
> directory. I don't do that at library initialization time for
> performance reasons, as font files are general
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 20:08 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
> > Right, the current DejaVu font package has a broken version of condensed
> > which does not correctly report the setwidth value in the OS/2 header of
> > the file. I think this will cause the inco
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
> Right, the current DejaVu font package has a broken version of condensed
> which does not correctly report the setwidth value in the OS/2 header of
> the file. I think this will cause the incorrect font selection error
> that we've seen in this case.
I
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 15:29 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I don't see how this relates to my analysis. I upgraded fontconfig,
> and the fonts were ugly. I removed DejaVu Condensed, and the fonts
> were nice again, and the result of fc-match changed as well; certainly
> you can explain what par
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I think Loïc's analysis is wrong here
(But certainly Cc:ing him would help getting his feedback.)
>as XUL isn't using the condensed
> version of the DejaVu (or Vera) fonts. For most pages, it is using the
> N
Le lundi 04 décembre 2006 à 12:37 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > I first thought of a configuration issue, and I can confirm that the
> > configuration files are exactly the same. Reverting the library brings
> > back Bitstream Vera in XUL applications.
> >
> > This doesn't seem to be a problem
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:36:00AM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le dimanche 03 décembre 2006 à 18:27 -0800, Keith Packard a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 00:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > I see the same situation while my fonts are Bitstream Vera.
> > >
> > >
Le dimanche 03 décembre 2006 à 18:27 -0800, Keith Packard a écrit :
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 00:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I see the same situation while my fonts are Bitstream Vera.
> >
> > I think Loïc's analysis is wrong here, as XUL isn't using the condensed
> > version of the DejaVu
12 matches
Mail list logo
