On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 18:23:14 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> The easy and obvious fix is to just ship this with xserver-xorg instead. To
> be honest, I'm not sure why this ended up in x11-common instead of here.
>
It used to be in xserver-common, which was removed and folded in
x11-common at so
Hi Brice,
> tags 400632 +wontfix
> thank you
> We are not going to remove the SUID bit because of this. The actual
> problem here is: why do you need x11-common installed on this system?
> Probably because of complex dependencies between all X packages? The
> upcoming xbase-clients split might ma
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:53:35PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Severity: serious
> tags 400632 -wontfix
>
> Greetings,
>
> The setuid usr/bin/X binary should not be shipped with x11-common
> because it's not *needed* for X11 clients. That by itself is a good
> enough reas
3 matches
Mail list logo
