Hi,
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 15:10 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> What's the status of this bug?
Oops, missed it a bit.
> It's currently set to only affect unstable. Is the current package
> something that we want in etch?
No, at least not as-is. I will upload a package which depends on
gradm2 and g
Hi,
What's the status of this bug?
It's currently set to only affect unstable. Is the current package
something that we want in etch?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:10:21AM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > BTW, given the contents of this debconf message, is it better to remove the
> > package anyway...?
> Ouch, I should have noted all debconf translators that this packag
Quoting Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > BTW, given the contents of this debconf message, is it better to remove the
> > package anyway...?
> Ouch, I should have noted all debconf translators that this package is
> _deprecated_
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> BTW, given the contents of this debconf message, is it better to remove the
> package anyway...?
Ouch, I should have noted all debconf translators that this package is
_deprecated_ and it does not worth translating it. Well, they seen it
a
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 06:23:40PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > An exit code of 30 happens if the message isn't displayed to the user.
> > Since the input happens at critical priority in debconf, the obvious
> > explanation would have been that you were using the non-interactive
> > frontend
> No, it exits because db_input is supposed to *display* it to the user as
> necessary, and the return value informs the caller whether this is actually
> done -- in the general case you get a 30 return /after/ it's been shown to
> the user, since the first time it's called is normally when it does
> An exit code of 30 happens if the message isn't displayed to the user.
> Since the input happens at critical priority in debconf, the obvious
> explanation would have been that you were using the non-interactive
> frontend. The config script is buggy anyway, since the question will only
> be dis
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 05:58:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> done -- in the general case you get a 30 return /after/ it's been shown to
> the user, since the first time it's called is normally when it does get
> displayed...
Ah, now I got it - and I can also explain it now :)
The messages whi
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 02:36:34PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 05:12:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > No, the postinst is fine; the failure is in the config script which it
> > calls, whose error exit propagates to the postinst.
> > An exit code of 30 happen
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 05:12:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> No, the postinst is fine; the failure is in the config script which it
> calls, whose error exit propagates to the postinst.
> An exit code of 30 happens if the message isn't displayed to the user.
Hm, if the call to /usr/share/debc
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:24:50AM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 11:01:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 04:38:39PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > > gradm version 1.9.15-2.1 fails to install:
> > Are you trying to use the non-
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 11:01:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 04:38:39PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > gradm version 1.9.15-2.1 fails to install:
> Are you trying to use the non-interactive front-end?
for debconf? No, my debconf frontend is Dialog.
I think
>
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> gradm failed to preconfigure, with exit status 30
> (Reading database ... 229400 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace gradm 1.9.15-2 (using .../gradm_1.9.15-2.1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement gradm ...
> Setting up gradm (1.9.1
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 04:38:39PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> gradm version 1.9.15-2.1 fails to install:
Are you trying to use the non-interactive front-end?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on
Package: gradm
Version: 1.9.15-2.1
Severity: grave
Hello,
gradm version 1.9.15-2.1 fails to install:
Preconfiguring packages ...
gradm failed to preconfigure, with exit status 30
(Reading database ... 229400 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace gradm 1.9.15-2 (using .
16 matches
Mail list logo
