On Wednesday 17 January 2007 12:25, you wrote:
> Separately, I feel that md support is important enough to enough users
> that I would not be comfortable releasing an installer with etch that
> couldn't handle software raid at install time; I imagine you would
> agree that if this happened to the i
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 12 January 2007 10:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the
> > raid flag to partitions. Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> I don't agree that this
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:58, Sven Luther wrote:
> 12:18 < vorlon> fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID
> install should be considered RC these days, do you disagree?
>
> What else is there to say ...
I am not going to fight this war, but I also refuse to treat this BR as RC
for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 397973 serious
Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag
to partitions.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> # 12:18 < vorlon> fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID install
> # should
severity 397973 important
thanks
On Friday 12 January 2007 10:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the
> raid flag to partitions. Severity set to `serious' from `important'
I don't agree that this issue is RC. It does not match an
5 matches
Mail list logo
