2006/11/17, Arnaud Quette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
> Would it be enough to drop the '| hotplug' from the dependencies? I don't
> think anyone's really using hotplug today in etch, I'm surprised to see that
> it's still in the archive at all.
ok, in this case, the nmu would suit me fine.
I fo
2006/11/17, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:59:45PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> it's not sufficient (otherwise I would have quickly done it ;-) since
> it only addresses udev enabled systems so post 2.6.3 kernels iirc.
> for previous release, hotplug rules are sti
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:59:45PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> it's not sufficient (otherwise I would have quickly done it ;-) since
> it only addresses udev enabled systems so post 2.6.3 kernels iirc.
> for previous release, hotplug rules are still needed. So there should
> be some test done ate
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:59:45PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> [quickly passing by, since I just had my 2nd baby this morning ;-) ... ]
Congratulations :-)
> it's not sufficient (otherwise I would have quickly done it ;-) since
> it only addresses udev enabled systems so post 2.6.3 kernels iirc
[quickly passing by, since I just had my 2nd baby this morning ;-) ... ]
2006/11/16, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
tags 396704 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my nut 2.0.4-2.2 NMU.
it's not sufficient (otherwise I would have quickly done it ;-) since
it only addresses
tags 396704 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my nut 2.0.4-2.2 NMU.
diff -Nru /tmp/LRfH3vNJyo/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog
/tmp/xC08KP7paL/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/LRfH3vNJyo/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog 2006-11-16 15:46:23.0
+0100
+++ /tmp/xC08KP7paL/nut-2.0.4/debian/
6 matches
Mail list logo
