Bug#396132: marked as done (gtk-gnutella: stable upstream version is out)

2007-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#396132: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#396132: Adopting gtk-gnutella: planned an upload for 0.96.3 soon

2007-04-13 Thread Luca Bruno
forcemerge 396132 410248 394876 400652 405462 tags 396132 + pending thanks Hi all, I apologize for the long time since the last gtk-gnutella upload, and for it not being included in etch. Previous maintainer (Anand Kumria) seems to be Missing In Action, so this package was recently orphaned. I ju

Bug#396132: #396132: gtk-gnutella: stable upstream version is out

2007-03-31 Thread Dererk
Hi again, I'm really sad that this matter didn't go to anywhere during this 4 months, even more, being the upstream source already debianized! :( I'll try to remark the main subject here: *The available version (even on sid) is _USELESS_ on gnutella network* Please, upload the current version o

Bug#396132:

2006-12-09 Thread Torrance
In any case, 0.96.3 is out and is signifcantly more stable than the current offering. Stable enough for testing, rather than unstable. Why aren't recent gtk-gnutella packages being built and moved downstream? Torrance (gtk-gnutella user, on Debian Etch)

Bug#396132: Patch

2006-12-09 Thread Matt Kraai
tag 396132 patch thanks I was able to build a package of 0.96.3 using the new upstream tarball and the attached patch against the .diff.gz. -- Matt http://ftbfs.org/ --- - 2006-12-09 11:11:15.317009300 -0800 +++ /tmp/gtknutella_0.96.3-0.diff.gz

Bug#396132: gtk-gnutella: stable upstream version is out

2006-11-06 Thread cascardo
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:43:49PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > Package: gtk-gnutella > > Version: 0.96.1svn12109-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: none > > > > As described in gtk-gnutella FAQ, non-stable versions expire after 90 > > days, w

Bug#396132: gtk-gnutella: stable upstream version is out

2006-11-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > Package: gtk-gnutella > Version: 0.96.1svn12109-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: none > > As described in gtk-gnutella FAQ, non-stable versions expire after 90 > days, while old stable versions expire after a year. Since Debian stable > versions take a

Bug#396132: gtk-gnutella: stable upstream version is out

2006-10-29 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Package: gtk-gnutella Version: 0.96.1svn12109-1 Severity: serious Justification: none As described in gtk-gnutella FAQ, non-stable versions expire after 90 days, while old stable versions expire after a year. Since Debian stable versions take a long time to be released, I suggest releasing the sta