On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 05:11:28PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> The powerpc buildds are running 2.4 kernels and it appears that this
> is what triggers that ominous bug. If they are upgraded to 2.6 kernels,
> then the package should build fine.
No - I am running a current sid here and it fails
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:46:08PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>I haven't been able to reproduce this problem *anywhere* and upstream
>hasn't seen a report about a problem like this. I'll probably do another
>gstreamer-perl upload to get more verbose output from this test, but the
>te
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:24:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> Which means someone needs to break this down to show what the testsuite
>>> failure is and why it fails.
>> As I reall
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:24:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:32:24PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > > While building your package in an up-to-date proc-mounted chroot,
> > > everything went smo
Hi Steve,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:24:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:32:24PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
>
> > While building your package in an up-to-date proc-mounted chroot,
> > everything went smoothly. Therefore, I am asking for a requeueing on
> > w-b pow
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:32:24PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> While building your package in an up-to-date proc-mounted chroot,
> everything went smoothly. Therefore, I am asking for a requeueing on
> w-b powerpc...
And it failed again on the buildd.
Which means someone needs to break this
6 matches
Mail list logo
