Bug#393331: Bug#393318: Unreproducable

2006-10-17 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 06:22:08PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Right, this would be because the new package doesn't export the same ABI as > the existing one (dropping symbol versioning), and thus libetpan has > dangling references to the versioned form of the symbols. So that's a bug > in c

Processed: Re: Bug#393318: Unreproducable

2006-10-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 393318 important Bug#393318: FTBFS: configure: error: libetpan 0.42 support required Severity set to `important' from `serious' > tags 393318 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#393318: FTBFS: configure: error: libetpan 0.42 support required There wer

Bug#393318: Unreproducable

2006-10-16 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 393318 important tags 393318 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:07:32AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > Just tried in a pbuilder. > etpan-ng 0.7.1-3 builde ok in pbuilder against libetpan 0.47-1 > Maybe something wrong in your chroot? Confirmed, builds here

Bug#393318: Unreproducable

2006-10-16 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Just tried in a pbuilder. etpan-ng 0.7.1-3 builde ok in pbuilder against libetpan 0.47-1 Maybe something wrong in your chroot? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]