On Wednesday 20 September 2006 01:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm saying that forcing the removal of aoetools from etch because it
> doesn't support mounting aoe devices at boot time won't get you any closer
> to your goal; instead, it will prevent users from using this packages for
> applications
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:11:37AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 23:42, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It would be equally valid to say that aoetools does not support
> > automounting, and therefore /usr/sbin is appropriate.
> So you're saying that a person that has an aoe
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 23:42, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It would be equally valid to say that aoetools does not support
> automounting, and therefore /usr/sbin is appropriate.
So you're saying that a person that has an aoe driven SAN should have to mount
it by doing something like:
mount /de
severity aoetools important
thanks
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:54:20PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Subject: aoetools: policy violation: binaries in wrong location
> Package: aoetools
> Version: 10-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Tags: patch
> The aoetools binaries
Subject: aoetools: policy violation: binaries in wrong location
Package: aoetools
Version: 10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: patch
The aoetools binaries need to be in the /sbin directory instead of
/usr/sbin since they are used to prepare the device to mount its
vo
5 matches
Mail list logo
