Bug#383304: bin-NMU scheduling for python transition

2006-08-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:16:28PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > The other two packages are arch: any and so can be binNMUed, but I'm > > puzzled why they build-depend on python-all-dev if they only build > > for the current version of python. Perhaps this is something you > > would like

Bug#383304: bin-NMU scheduling for python transition

2006-08-20 Thread Steve Langasek
Oi Gustavo, On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:20:29AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Some of my Python packages should simply require a binNMU to be in > shape with the new python package which is 2.4: > ruledispatch (python-dispatch) > pyprotocols (python-protocols) > turbojson (python-turbojso

Bug#383304: bin-NMU scheduling for python transition

2006-08-17 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Hello, Some of my Python packages should simply require a binNMU to be in shape with the new python package which is 2.4: ruledispatch (python-dispatch) pyprotocols (python-protocols) turbojson (python-turbojson) turbogears (python-turbogears) This last one is in experimental, so I'm not sure a