Bug#381622: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-08 Thread Per Olofsson
Sven Hoexter: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:14:06AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: > > > Hmm. I think the best solution is if we add > > > > (cd /usr/share/lyx && ./configure.py) > > > > to lyx-common's postinst script. This simply restores the old > > behaviour and it seems to work well enough. > If

Bug#381622: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-08 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:14:06AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: > Hmm. I think the best solution is if we add > > (cd /usr/share/lyx && ./configure.py) > > to lyx-common's postinst script. This simply restores the old > behaviour and it seems to work well enough. If it works as a workaround ok but

Bug#381622: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-08 Thread Per Olofsson
Aurelien Jarno: > > I have workarounded this bug in sdcc by running in debian/rules: > > > > mkdir -p ~/.lyx && cd ~/.lyx && /usr/share/lyx/configure.py > > Actually this does not work, because it seems to be forbidden to create > files in the home directory of a build daemon. > > That would

Bug#381622: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 07:09:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: > > Sven Hoexter: > > > I did not look into this very deep but as far as I can tell those > > > files are now longer existing as global files. They're now created > > > in

Bug#381622: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: > Sven Hoexter: > > I did not look into this very deep but as far as I can tell those > > files are now longer existing as global files. They're now created > > in ~/lyx/ for every user. > > Same for packages.lst if this pops up somewher

Bug#381622: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-07 Thread Per Olofsson
Sven Hoexter: > I did not look into this very deep but as far as I can tell those > files are now longer existing as global files. They're now created > in ~/lyx/ for every user. > Same for packages.lst if this pops up somewhere else. True, but they are not created if lyx is run in batch mode (i.e

Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-07 Thread Per Olofsson
Aurelien Jarno: > > Per Olofsson a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > You're right, these files should be removed upon upgrade. Regarding > > the FTBFS, the problem seems to be that lyx doesn't automatically > > perform a Reconfigure if run in batch mode. We should probably forward > > this bug upstream. > >

Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Per Olofsson a écrit : > Hi, > > You're right, these files should be removed upon upgrade. Regarding > the FTBFS, the problem seems to be that lyx doesn't automatically > perform a Reconfigure if run in batch mode. We should probably forward > this bug upstream. > Well you mean this file is now g

Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
I did not look into this very deep but as far as I can tell those files are now longer existing as global files. They're now created in ~/lyx/ for every user. Same for packages.lst if this pops up somewhere else. Sven -- If you won't forgive me the rest of my life Let me apologize while I'm still

Bug#381622: textclass.lst

2006-08-06 Thread Per Olofsson
Hi, You're right, these files should be removed upon upgrade. Regarding the FTBFS, the problem seems to be that lyx doesn't automatically perform a Reconfigure if run in batch mode. We should probably forward this bug upstream. -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub