Bug#375048: bigloo: 2.7a-1.3 breaks jvm backend

2006-06-24 Thread Yann Dirson
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 06:41:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I verified on my system, before proposing this patch, that the test suite > passes if I re-run it after installing sablevm; i.e., there is no problem > with the resulting bigloo binaries, they just are not compatible with the > gcj r

Bug#375048: bigloo: 2.7a-1.3 breaks jvm backend

2006-06-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Yann, On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:49:58AM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > The 1.3 NMU has a problem, as shown by the results of jvm-test in the > log. Because some time ago the "mmap" test was known to fail, the jvm > tests are not fatal to the build. Now sablevm/classpath have > improved, ant we

Bug#375048: bigloo: 2.7a-1.3 breaks jvm backend

2006-06-22 Thread Yann Dirson
Package: bigloo Version: 2.7a-1.3 Severity: serious The 1.3 NMU has a problem, as shown by the results of jvm-test in the log. Because some time ago the "mmap" test was known to fail, the jvm tests are not fatal to the build. Now sablevm/classpath have improved, ant we can make this test fatal a