Hi,
It seems gcc bug #381710 got fixed, so it should now probably build
without the patch.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:46:30PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Ryan believes that the problem with MIPS is a kernel issue, and was
> planning to upgrade the kernel on the buildds soonish.
>
> As far as hppa goes, perl-5.8.8-5 successfully autobuilt on bld-3, then
> -6 failed on the same machine.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:44:22PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
>Is there any chance to get this fixed within the next week or two? It's
>already blocking something like 60 packages from entering testing.
Not a whole lot that I can do about it.
Ryan believes that the problem with MIPS is a kernel i
Hi.
Is there any chance to get this fixed within the next week or two? It's
already blocking something like 60 packages from entering testing.
Regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I've taking a closer look at why op/pack.t is failing. I
was looking at this at hppa, incase that matters.
Here is a list of the lines having a problem:
not ok 505
# For list (-128, -1, 0, 1, 127) (total -1) packed with c unpack '%53c' gave 0,
expected 9.00719925474099e+15
not ok 615
# For
Package: perl
Version: 5.8.8-6
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
perl 5.8.8-6 fails 1 test on MIPS and hppa, which keeps it from being
updated in Etch. This is not meant as a useful bug report, but as a
"reminder" (in case that's useful) that as usual perl FTBFS-s on re
6 matches
Mail list logo
