On Jul 27, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why all this fuss about using debconf? Can't it just treat 2.6.8 the same as
> 2.4? I.e., when detecting linux 2.6.8 is running, udev installs itself, but
> in disabled form.
It does, the UI which some people vocally requested but are not bot
> When detecting a 2.4 kernel is
> running, udev instaklls itself, but in disabled form. When detecting the sarge
> 2.6.8 kernel, udev refuses to install, and if you already had part of gnome
> upgraded, you are left with a mess.
Why all this fuss about using debconf? Can't it just treat 2.6.8 t
2 matches
Mail list logo
