Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU

2006-06-10 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Friday, 2006-06-09 at 19:41:19 +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Friday, 2006-06-09 at 19:28:34 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > Aha, you are using CONFIG_HIPPI -- that's marked as experimental and is > > rather obscure. (It seems to be some kind of supercomputer networking > > standard.)

Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU

2006-06-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:40:36PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: >> Given http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/13/274 I believe that the line can simply >> be dropped. Let me know if you need an NMU :-) > If you could, then please yes. It's on its way. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ --

Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU

2006-06-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:08:15PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > CC [M] net/ipsec/ipcomp.o > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c: In function 'skb_copy_ipcomp': > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'private' > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named '

Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU

2006-06-09 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Friday, 2006-06-09 at 19:28:34 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:08:15PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > CC [M] net/ipsec/ipcomp.o > > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c: In function 'skb_copy_ipcomp': > > net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named > >

Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU

2006-06-09 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Am Friday 09 June 2006 18:28 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: > Aha, you are using CONFIG_HIPPI -- that's marked as experimental and is > rather obscure. (It seems to be some kind of supercomputer networking > standard.) The offending lines are: > > #ifdef CONFIG_HIPPI > n->private.ifield=skb->pri

Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU

2006-06-06 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:56:20PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: >> You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too >> much use. > Yes, the compilation problem - it would be also helpful if you can reproduce > it. Let's see. Default .config and latest linux-source-2.6.16

Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU

2006-06-06 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Am Tuesday 06 June 2006 19:15 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: > You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too > much use. Yes, the compilation problem - it would be also helpful if you can reproduce it. Thanks for the NMU, Rene pgpsgpkv6X2k5.pgp Description: PGP signa

Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU

2006-06-06 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:07:17PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: >> Attached is the diff for my openswan 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU. (Note that >> all the changes, except for the one to debian/changelog, are done in the >> upstream tarball.) > Thanks, I will apply it as soon as possible (but am currently