Hi!
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060413 12:29]:
> Package: fp-compiler
> Severity: 2.0.0-4
> Severity: grave
>
> /usr/bin/ppcppc just seg faults:
[..]
> stat("fpc.cfg", 0xfff192c0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> directory)
> stat("/home/tbm/.fpc.cfg", 0xfff19090) = -1 ENO
severity 362410 important
thanks
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:56:46PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> The only differences I can find are:
>
> - bruckner has a 2.4 kernel (2.4.25), your machine has a 2.6 kernel
> (2.6.16-1-powerpc64)
> - your machine is a quad power5, bruckner is a pre
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:29:13PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> /usr/bin/ppcppc just seg faults:
This is odd. I've tested it on bruckner, and it works just fine. /usr/bin/fpc
is statically linked, so this is no shlibs issue; the straces up to the
segfault are near-identical (except for one (re
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:54:46PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
>> When I thought both of these files, I get another segfault... the strace is
>> attached.
> Thanks for the report. I'll investigate it soon.
Any progress on this?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCR
On 4/13/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: fp-compiler
> Severity: 2.0.0-4
> Severity: grave
>
> /usr/bin/ppcppc just seg faults:
[snip]
> When I thought both of these files, I get another segfault... the strace is
> attached.
Thanks for the report. I'll investigate it soo
Package: fp-compiler
Severity: 2.0.0-4
Severity: grave
/usr/bin/ppcppc just seg faults:
183:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..date-1.4.2/bindings/pascal] /usr/bin/fpc
zsh: segmentation fault /usr/bin/fpc
184:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..date-1.4.2/bindings/pascal]
184:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..date-1.4.2/bindings/pascal]
6 matches
Mail list logo
