Bug#358295: Status update

2006-04-14 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Qui, 2006-04-13 às 20:23 +0200, Martin Michlmayr escreveu: > Well, it may be old but it's the latest version in unstable. Sure. What I meant with that was that it has not changed. > What's > the status of moving 1.7 to unstable? Maybe it's fixed there. It probably is, just like another handf

Bug#358295: Status update

2006-04-14 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Hi, I do not really have an idea on what's going on here, specially considering how old this release actually is. I have asked upstream about it, and am currently waiting for a reply on the issue. -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Bug#358295: Status update

2006-04-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
severity 358295 important thanks * Guilherme de S. Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-13 16:52]: > It probably is, just like another handful of issues. It has already > received some polishing on experimental, and should be ready for > upload to unstable soon. Could you test whether it solves th

Processed: Re: Bug#358295: Status update

2006-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 358295 important Bug#358295: FTBFS: test suite failure: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... FAILED Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#358295: Status update

2006-04-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Guilherme de S. Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-13 14:56]: > I do not really have an idea on what's going on here, specially > considering how old this release actually is. I have asked upstream > about it, and am currently waiting for a reply on the issue. Well, it may be old but it's the