Right. I can build a working binary if I do two things:
1) Add -march=i386 to the gnu-efi and elilo builds
2) Use plain binutils-2.16.1, and not binutils-2.16.1cvs20060117
The first of these is easy, the second involves finding out what's
broken in binutils. What fun.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMA
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:59:39PM -0700, Brett Johnson wrote:
> Yes, I believe that to be the case also. It's not clear from the bug
> report which toolchain Matthew is using. In Sarge, if gcc4 is used to
> compile elilo, I know it will fail on both ia32 and ia64 due to an older
> version of gn
mjg59 wrote:
> > I have a working elilo.efi that was built on a gentoo system using 3.6
> > source, so my suspicion is that there's a toolchain bug here somewhere.
Yes, I believe that to be the case also. It's not clear from the bug
report which toolchain Matthew is using. In Sarge, if gcc4 is
Package: elilo
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On IA32 systems, attempting to run elilo.efi gives:
'elilo' not found
Exit status code: Invalid Parameter
The Sarge version gives
Exit status code: Load Error
I have a working elilo.efi that was built on a gentoo system usi
4 matches
Mail list logo
