Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Thursday 09 Feb 2006 01:47, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> powersaved has to be started after dbus, because it uses dbus. So the
>> ordering is correct.
>> The problem must be something else. Can you investigate this a little
>> further?
>
> Here's what I've gathered from bo
On Thursday 09 Feb 2006 01:47, Michael Biebl wrote:
> powersaved has to be started after dbus, because it uses dbus. So the
> ordering is correct.
> The problem must be something else. Can you investigate this a little
> further?
Here's what I've gathered from bootlogd:
Thu Feb 9 00:43:06 2006:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: powersaved
> Version: 0.9.25-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I'm not sure if it should be filed against dbus or powersaved.
> By default powersaved is started in runlevel 2 at S25 whereas dbus is
> started at S20.
> powersaved f
Package: powersaved
Version: 0.9.25-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I'm not sure if it should be filed against dbus or powersaved.
By default powersaved is started in runlevel 2 at S25 whereas dbus is
started at S20.
powersaved fails to start at this order. Manual stop of
4 matches
Mail list logo
