On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:43:09AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> > If you or Thomas can do the upload for me, that would be great.
> > The updated version can be downloaded from:
> > http://www.gnifty.net/code/xscorch/
> OK, I've built it and, should it pass my testin
Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> If you or Thomas can do the upload for me, that would be great.
> The updated version can be downloaded from:
> http://www.gnifty.net/code/xscorch/
OK, I've built it and, should it pass my testing, will upload.
I took the liberty to document in the changelog that no cha
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:45:05AM -0800, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:37:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Well, I can't confirm this. Jacob, please consider the attached
> > patch, which fixes some quoting issues in configure.ac and
> > re-autoconfs the source. Co
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:37:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Is it confirmed that this stack smash bug is a security vulnerability?
> Not all are...
I am not aware of any security issues with this stack smash. You can
overwrite up to 10 chars of stack but I certainly don't know how I would
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 09:21:12AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > You might consider mailing on -mentors, asking for a one time sponsor;
> > I'm mailing -qa for you right now.
> > In fact, please do this asap, because of the stack smash bug. Also
> > change urgency to at
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> You might consider mailing on -mentors, asking for a one time sponsor;
> I'm mailing -qa for you right now.
> In fact, please do this asap, because of the stack smash bug. Also
> change urgency to at least medium, and provide a patch to the security
> team, since the packag
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:36:30PM -0800, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
> > group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
> > produced a bi
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
> group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
> produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
> recent version in
package xscorch
tag 346856 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build log is attached.
9 matches
Mail list logo
