First off, I have no interest in freecdb. I am not actively using
software that uses it, and have no time to improve it. Feel free to
do what you want. If you are too stuck with bureaucracy not to do
that until I've formally orphaned the package, please hold your breath
and wait.
Gerrit Pape wrote
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:05:28PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > reopen 345868
> > thanks
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > > Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract
>
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:05:28PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > reopen 345868
> > thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > > Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attra
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 345868
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract
> > my attention earlier, the release critical bug is resolved as inva
reopen 345868
thanks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > I don't know how much we care about that...
> > > cvm
> > > mailfront
>
5 matches
Mail list logo