On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:30:53PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 03:12:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Since there is no libssl097-dev any longer I guess I'll have to recompile
> > > all
> > > packages.
> > It should actually be possible to fix th
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:17:41AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> The resulting packages naturally only depend on libssl0.9.7, and seem
> to work fine. This might be a workaround.
Great, yes, this is a workaround. Unfortunately it's a *local* workaround.
Even if I can generate i386 packages compiled f
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> severity 343487 grave
> tags 343487 pending confirmed sid etch
> reassign 343487 nessus
> thanks
>
> I downgraded the nessus client version to 2.2.5-2 (which is *not* compiled
> against both 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 SSL libra
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:54:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > * nessusd 2.2.5-3, the server, is linked against both 0.9.7 and
> > 0.9.8
>
> Ok, I don't see this either:
>
> $ ldd /tmp/nessus/usr/sbin/nessusd|grep ssl
> libssl.so.0.9.8 => not found
> $
Funny, it seems that ldd ou
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 03:12:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Since there is no libssl097-dev any longer I guess I'll have to recompile
> > all
> > packages.
>
> It should actually be possible to fix this with binNMUs on the autobuilders,
> I think. I'll go ahead and queue those now.
P
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:59:14AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:31:11AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> >
> > * nessusd 2.2.5-3, the server, is linked against both 0.9.7 and
> > 0.9.8
> Just found out why this happened. The Nessus ser
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:31:11AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> * nessusd 2.2.5-3, the server, is linked against both 0.9.7 and
> 0.9.8
Just found out why this happened. The Nessus server gets compile against
both versions since libnasl depends on 0.9.7, I did not notice this:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:31:11AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:16:26AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > The issue should be fixed by recompiling the client against a set of the
> > > libraries, and should affect only the 2.2.5-3 version under i386. No
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:16:26AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The issue should be fixed by recompiling the client against a set of the
> > libraries, and should affect only the 2.2.5-3 version under i386. Notice,
> > also that the package has an undeclared dependency on libssl0.9.7 (the
> >
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> After debugging this issue in a system that Marc Haber set up for testing
> I've found two different issues, one is a misconfiguration, the other is a
> problem with the nessus package (the client)
> - (fixing the ab
severity 343487 grave
tags 343487 pending confirmed sid etch
reassign 343487 nessus
thanks
After debugging this issue in a system that Marc Haber set up for testing
I've found two different issues, one is a misconfiguration, the other is a
problem with the nessus package (the client)
- localhost
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 343487 grave
Bug#343487: nessusd: cannot connect to 2.2.5-3 server
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 343487 pending confirmed sid etch
Bug#343487: nessusd: cannot connect to 2.2.5-3 server
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
12 matches
Mail list logo
