Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2006-03-15 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 343250 important thanks Since this bug apparently only affects compression of win32 PE executables, and not ordinary Linux ELF executables, I think it's fair to say that the package is not rendered "mostly unusable". Downgrading the bug accordingly. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2006-02-08 Thread Robert Luberda
Max Alekseyev wrote: >> So could you please send me the file on which 'upx -d' fails? > Testcase is attached to this message. > $ unzip test.zip Yeah, I should have asked you about the file at the very beginning. It's win32/pe executable, not linux/i386 which I assumed... Thanks a lot! Now I ca

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2006-02-08 Thread Robert Luberda
Max Alekseyev wrote: Hi, >> >> Please check if this version works for you on amd64. > > > No. It reports: > > upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned > char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed. Sorry about the delay. As I wrote last time, I can't reproduce the bug mys

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-12-23 Thread Robert Luberda
Max Alekseyev wrote: Hi, > > No. It reports: > > upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned > char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed. > Aborted Thanks. I tried the command on pergolesi.debian.org (an amd64 machine accessible for Debian developers), but can't reproduce

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-12-18 Thread Max Alekseyev
Robert Luberda wrote: I've just uploaded 1:1.94+0.20051214cvs-2, which fixes the error. The patch is very simple, I'm attaching it in case you didn't want to wait for autobuilders and recompile the package yourself. Please check if this version works for you on amd64. No. It reports: upx: ut

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Luberda
Max Alekseyev wrote: Hi, > It fails to be build from sources on amd64 with the following error: I've just uploaded 1:1.94+0.20051214cvs-2, which fixes the error. The patch is very simple, I'm attaching it in case you didn't want to wait for autobuilders and recompile the package yourself. Pleas

Bug#343250: [Bulk] Re: Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-12-16 Thread Max Alekseyev
Robert Luberda wrote: Thanks for your report. I've just uploaded new CVS snapshot of upx-ucl-beta (1.94+0.20051214cvs-1). Could you please check if the problem still exists in that version? It fails to be build from sources on amd64 with the following error: g++ -O2 -g -DWITH_UCL -o packmast.

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-12-15 Thread Robert Luberda
Max wrote: > > upx is broken on debian-amd64. For example, on "upx -d somefile" it reports > > upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned char]: > Assertion `(int)d == d' failed. > Aborted Thanks for your report. I've just uploaded new CVS snapshot of upx-ucl-beta (1.9

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-12-13 Thread Max
Package: upx-ucl-beta Version: 1:1.94+0.20051022cvs-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable upx is broken on debian-amd64. For example, on "upx -d somefile" it reports upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed. Abo