Version: 1.5.2+b2
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:34:42PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered:
> > > Step 1: libtag
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered:
> > Step 1: libtagcoll-dev
> > Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev
> > (since they stat
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw
> that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was
> just a matter of waiting.
> Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is in
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw
> that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was
> just a matter of waiting.
> Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is indeed conn
Hello,
Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw
that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was
just a matter of waiting.
Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is indeed connected to the
C++ allocator thing, and the recompile was incomp
5 matches
Mail list logo
