http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=16218
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have the exact same problem with 5.0.18, on INSERT DELAYED server crashes
and restarts, without it it seems to be working fine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux elak 2.6.14.3-grsec #1 PREEMPT Fri Dec 2 14:59:02 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l mysql-server-5*
ii mys
Hi Olaf
On 2006-01-01 Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Version 5.0.16 is also crashing, but with more info in syslog.
> Without the delayed the query works fine.
5.0.17 is already ready for upload and 5.0.18 seems to have been released
over the weekend. I'll package it today and we see if the bug is st
Hi,
Version 5.0.16 is also crashing, but with more info in syslog.
Without the delayed the query works fine.
On another 5.0.16 server the query also works fine so maybe a bit of
load is needed.
CREATE TABLE `xwi_login_failures` (
`ipa` int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
`gsku` int(11) NOT NULL
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 5.0.16-1
Followup-For: Bug #341705
MySQL crashes silently (no entries in syslog) and for no apparent
reason. The DB has virtually zero load (still busy setting it up for a
small webserver). Any idea how I can trace the problem?
Regards
Alexis
-- System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:10:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
sean finney wrote:
> i've created an etch pbuilder chroot and produced some debs:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~seanius/mysql/etch/
>
> i haven't verified anything about these other than the fact that they
> built sucessfully, so a once-over would be appreciated. after i've
> heard back from the
hi christian,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:36:47AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Feel free to upload this to t-p-u.
> I created an etch-5.0 branch for this based on the current 5.0 branch:
> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/mysql-dfsg-41/branches/etch-5.0
ok, i've merged the changes (just lines in
Hello Sean
On 2005-12-06 sean finney wrote:
> as steve suggested, i've given them a 5.0.16-0+etch1 version so they
> will immediately upgrade to the versions currently in sid. they
> are based off of what's in svn as 5.0.16-2 but not yet released (which
> is just the initial upstream release + a
hi steve, olaf,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:30:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yeah, it simply won't work. You'd need to give this build a distinguishing
> version number that's < the version in unstable; perhaps 5.0.16-0+etch1.
>
> I'd advise against giving it a different upstream version nu
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 04:21:48AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> while in a lecture this morning i found my thoughts travelling back to
> this bug report for some reason and...
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:58:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > New upstream versions for RC bugfixes are allowed vi
hi,
while in a lecture this morning i found my thoughts travelling back to
this bug report for some reason and...
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:58:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> New upstream versions for RC bugfixes are allowed via t-p-u, yes.
this may stem from my unfamiliarity with tpu: how
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:58:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > that said, if you can get someone from the release team to sign
> > off on such an upload, i'll happily do it when i have a chance.
>
> New upstream versions for RC bugfixes are allowed via t-p-u, yes.
okay, cool--thanks. i'll s
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:29:56PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:52:22PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > >well, if you're not able/willing to try the version in unstable, then
> > >i suggest that we do the following:
> > I can confirm that the linked reduced test case
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:21:52PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:04:41PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Isn't it possible (and much easier) to compile 5.0.16 completely in a
> > testing dev environment and upload that?
> hrm, i didn't think that you could do that wit
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:04:41PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Isn't it possible (and much easier) to compile 5.0.16 completely in a
> testing dev environment and upload that?
hrm, i didn't think that you could do that with tpu (uploading
a new upstream version). my impression, and the dev
sean finney wrote:
notfound 341705 5.0.16-1
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:32:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
If/when binutils gets fixed it's at least another 10 days.
What about testing-proposed-updates?
honestly, it's more work/time than i'm willing to give, and i'm reluctant
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 341705 5.0.16-1
Bug#341705: mysql-server-5.0: Server crashing
Bug marked as not found in version 5.0.16-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
notfound 341705 5.0.16-1
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:32:58PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> If/when binutils gets fixed it's at least another 10 days.
> What about testing-proposed-updates?
honestly, it's more work/time than i'm willing to give, and i'm reluctant
to put work into a probl
sean finney wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:52:22PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
well, if you're not able/willing to try the version in unstable, then
i suggest that we do the following:
I can confirm that the linked reduced test case does not crash in
5.0.16-Debian_1.
okay, i w
hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:52:22PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> >well, if you're not able/willing to try the version in unstable, then
> >i suggest that we do the following:
>
> I can confirm that the linked reduced test case does not crash in
> 5.0.16-Debian_1.
okay, i wasn't sure if
sean finney wrote:
hi olaf,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
See for example http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=13545
The server is running custom game lobby servers (http://xwis.net/),
scripts and dynamic web pages and it kept restarting within a minute.
I can
hi olaf,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> See for example http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=13545
> The server is running custom game lobby servers (http://xwis.net/),
> scripts and dynamic web pages and it kept restarting within a minute.
> I can't tell for sur
sean finney wrote:
hi olaf,
sorry there hasn't been a response sooner, christian's on
vacation and i just realized that i wasn't subscribed to the bug
feed for mysql-dfsg-5.0.
anyway, i'll need some more information before we can do anything:
- does it crash on certain queries, or other condit
tags 341705 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
hi olaf,
sorry there hasn't been a response sooner, christian's on
vacation and i just realized that i wasn't subscribed to the bug
feed for mysql-dfsg-5.0.
anyway, i'll need some more information before we can do anything:
- does it crash on certain q
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:41:19PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Package: mysql-server-5.0
> Version: 5.0.13rc-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> I just upgraded a server from 4.1 to 5.0 and now the MySQL server keeps
> crashing.
> The 5.0 version in testing i
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 5.0.13rc-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi,
I just upgraded a server from 4.1 to 5.0 and now the MySQL server keeps
crashing.
The 5.0 version in testing is pre-stable and two months old.
I'm aware of the gcc dependency issue and a
27 matches
Mail list logo
