>> I see its /etc/update-flashplugin.conf.rb lists the versions in sarge
>> as "unusable" - a strong argument for replacing them in the "stable"
>> release for Sarge. I'll see whether using one of
>> "macromedia.mplug.org" => "/site_uh.html",
>> "macromedia.rediris.es" => "/site_ri.html"
>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> I see its /etc/update-flashplugin.conf.rb lists the versions in sarge
> as "unusable" - a strong argument for replacing them in the "stable"
> release for Sarge. I'll see whether using one of
> "macromedia.mplug.org" => "/site
Sorry about slow response. Busy week.
>> You seem to be using an old version. Does the version in "unstable"
>> work for you ?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (using Etch) shall perhaps respond, but [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> uses stable
> (Sarge). If the version in use by Sarge is known to be sub-optimal,
> pe
> You seem to be using an old version. Does the version in "unstable"
> work for you ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (using Etch) shall perhaps respond, but [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uses stable
(Sarge). If the version in use by Sarge is known to be sub-optimal,
perhaps replacing it by a better one wouldn't be bad
Hello Eddy,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 11:26:48AM +, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Checking new upstream release...
> I: checking http://macromedia.rediris.es/tarball/debian/...
> No new version is detected. ( = not installed)
You seem to be using an old version. Does the version in "unstable"
work
5 matches
Mail list logo
