On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
> Hello Kurt,
>
> will/could the changes in 0.9.8a-7 have any effect on the postfix issues
> I'm experiencing? Is it worth a try?
A new postfix version has been uploaded to unstable, which has as
changelog entry:
* New upstream, fixes
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
> Hello Kurt,
>
> will/could the changes in 0.9.8a-7 have any effect on the postfix issues
> I'm experiencing? Is it worth a try?
It might be. It seems that postfix is using the BIO interface,
so it might be your problem. It never h
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:29:37PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I'm sorry, but looking into the logs the last days and trying a few thing I
> have to say the following:
Are you sure both sides of the connection have a fixed version?
Things work without problems here, and I can'
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:24:33PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
>
> Why are the two packages openssl and libsslx.x.x not depending on each
> other?
openssl does depend on libssl0.9.8, it has a depends on:
libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8a-1)
There is no reason they should be from the same source version.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:20:10PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
>
> I tried it after Yari wrote again (I attached his mail at the bottom of
> this mail). And it works. I also do not think it is the best solution but I
> think it is a workaround until the bug in OpenSSL is fixed.
The default cipher
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:23:13PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> > openssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
>
> Was this meant for me? Otherwise sorry for spamming around... ;-)
>
> I u
6 matches
Mail list logo
