severity 347884 serious
# passivetex will be removed from testing
thanks
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I could build the docs of gstreamer0.8 without having passivetex
>> installed. I could not test the full build as it gave an FTBFS at
>> another place, which was definitely not ca
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could build the docs of gstreamer0.8 without having passivetex
> installed. I could not test the full build as it gave an FTBFS at
> another place, which was definitely not caused by missing passivetex.
I didn't get a FTBFS in a sid chroot (i386).
Re
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might
> miss that. Do you have a solution for gstreamer0.8?
Yes: I tried to find out which problems would occur, and it turned out
that the build-dependency can simply be dropped: #347
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:51:35AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Frank, hi Steve!
> On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> > source package or anywhere in Debian (main). Thus it seems the package
> > is not even functional.
> On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > However, gs
On Fre, 13 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> > I could do the following: Take the sources from texlive (where
> > passivetex was excluded due to its existence in debian) and try to fix
> > the passivetex packages. It shouldn't be too complicated, but probably
> > would be a complete rewrite of the sc
On 12.01.06 Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi *,
> > I was about to create a patch for the package, but I discovered
> > more issues. Most notably, the Makefile in the example directory
> > fails because it cannot find a
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might
>> miss that. Do you have a solution for gstreamer0.8?
>
> I could do the following: Take the sources from texlive (where
> passivet
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might
> miss that. Do you have a solution for gstreamer0.8?
I'll look into it during the weekend.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Hi Frank, hi Steve!
On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> source package or anywhere in Debian (main). Thus it seems the package
> is not even functional.
On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might
> miss that. Do
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The package has two serious bugs, and some normal ones:
> I was about to create a patch for the package, but I discovered more
> issues. Most notably, the Makefile in the example directory
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The package has two serious bugs, and some normal ones:
I was about to create a patch for the package, but I discovered more
issues. Most notably, the Makefile in the example directory fails
because it cannot find a file "tei.xsl", which does not exist i
11 matches
Mail list logo
